edtech ebooks

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Subscribe

Our Reading Math Program

free trial

free teacher resources

Browse by Tag

Tips, Tools and Technology for Educators

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Improving Teacher Quality: What Will It Take?

Posted by Denis Soukhanov on Tue, Nov 17, 2009
 

diigo it

School Reform

 

With the new school year across the U.S. well underway, much focus in the past few weeks has turned toward the profession of teaching. Obama's new reform efforts are compelling schools to tie teacher evaluations with student test scores in order for schools to qualify for a piece of the $4.35 billion slotted to be distributed to states as part of the federal government's "Race to the Top" competition. Also, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan highlighted the poor state of teacher preparation as part of his talk to an audience of educators at Columbia University's Teachers College. Recently, the National Academy of Education released a white paper which nicely sums up key recommendations for improving teacher quality in the U.S. These include:

Recruitment of Teachers

This includes improving the pool of applicants to the teaching profession so teaching is seen as an attractive career, increasing the standards for entry into teacher education programs, developing reliable screening tools to ensure that people entering the teaching profession will be successful from the start, and systematizing better practices for teacher recruitment, funding them and codifying policies which support them.

Teacher Preparation

As Arne Duncan pointed out in his speech at Columbia University, institutions charged with preparing future teachers need to do a better job at providing teachers with the appropriate kind and amount of training they need to successfully meet the demands of their school and classroom. Specifically, NAEd listed the following as features of teacher education programs which produce better teacher candidates than others:

  • More courses required for entry or exit in their chosen content area (i.e., mathematics or reading)
  • A required capstone project (for example, a portfolio of work done in classrooms with students or a research paper)
  • Careful oversight of student teaching
  • A focus on providing candidates with practical coursework to learn specific practices
  • The amount of opportunity for candidates to learn about local district curricula
  • Student teaching experiences that are aligned with later teaching assignments in terms of grade level and subject area

Teacher Retention

Teachers, in general, gradually improve in their teaching proficiency after their first year of teaching and level off after five years. Many leave the profession after the second year, and by year five, 30% of teachers stop teaching. Furthermore, teachers who perform better on standardized tests and who have stronger teaching qualifications form a large part of those who leave the profession early in their careers. To offset this, NAEd recommends that programs should be developed to identify highly effective teachers and implement ways to retain them such as financial incentives and opportunities for professional growth.

Professional Development

Teachers need on-going professional development that helps them address their professional needs, the grades and subjects they teach, and the needs of the students they serve. In addition to these kinds of professional development, there is a need to identify 'better' professional development. While some reports show that many teachers who participate in professional development make desired changes to their instructional practices and show increased content knowledge, there is little evidence to support that it substantively translates into increased student achievement.

Effective recruitment, training, retention and professional development -- all of these sound like intuitive places to focus on improving teacher quality. On the other hand, why don't all of these domains already have policies, funding, and programs in place to ensure that teachers, who are entrusted with our children's education and well-being during the day, are well-qualified, well-trained, and reliable? It's difficult to predict what it will take to bring the profession of teaching the kind of stature it deserves (perhaps like that of a physician or an attorney) and the kind of funding it needs, but without these substantive changes, it is dubious whether or not the recommendations NAEd made, the changes Arne Duncan calls for, or the achievement results Obama's administration wants to reward, will ever take place...and take hold.

 

Article by Paolo Martin

Photo by iboy_daniel

Reading Curriculum and Reading Games by Learning Today


Tags: , , , , ,

COMMENTS

I am one of those teachers who left public education. 
 
And I am one of the teachers that Arne clearly wants to attract and retain.  
 
I have tested above the 98th percentile in almost every standardized test I have taken (Stanford-Binet IQ, SAT, GRE, Praxis II tests in Chemistry and Biology).  
 
I graduated with Honors in Chemistry, worked and published as a scientist and made a mid-life career decision to enter education. 
 
I have a range of experience in both private and public schools. I have taught in both inner city schools and in one of the wealthiest school districts in the country. 
 
Those experiences have informed my perspectives.  
 
My educational websites have twice won state-level awards. I am considered an highly respected, well-liked, and innovative teacher by students, parents, fellow teachers and administrators alike. 
 
I left public school education because, I could not stand the nonsense that goes on in there. Particularly, the teacher evaluations and the focus on testing. 
 
I now teach in a private school and intend to remain in private independent education. 
 
In my opinion, Arne's call to tie teacher evaluation to performance on standardized tests, will increase the number of highly intelligent, innovative educators leaving the ranks of public education. 
 
As Ross Perot, might colorfully say, the next giant sucking sound you will hear is due to the rapid flood of innovative teachers leaving the profession.  
 
There is precious little or no room for innovation in public education. Any evaluation of teachers tied to performance on standardized tests will just tighten the noose. Such measures directed from above turn the joys of teaching into drudgery. 
 
As long as politicians continue to make their political fortunes by scapegoating and placing the blame on others, primarily teachers, the most highly competent students will seek out other careers. 
 
Despite what Arne says about attracting highly qualified applicants to the teaching profession, what he is actually doing is driving them away. 
 
As one Cornell graduate and young teacher confided in me, "All my friends ask me why I am putting up with this nonsense (teacher evaluations based on drilling for the test) when I could be making six figures in another career?" 
 
Arne's consistent message has been to up the ante with misguided teacher evaluations directed more and more exclusively toward a failed national testing program. I don't see how that improves a climate of blame.  
 
However, it does sounds like a good formula for driving away our brightest and best.  
 
Just my humble opinion forged from 15 years of teaching experience.

posted @ Sunday, November 22, 2009 11:34 AM by Ex-public school teacher


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics